Launch of Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Canceled Due to Mere 2% Performance Difference
Testing of the unreleased Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus prototype has revealed only a 2% performance difference compared to its lower-tier model, clarifying Intel's decision to cancel its launch.
The Truth Behind the Canceled Launch
Last year, rumors circulated about the existence of Intel’s Core Ultra 9 290K Plus, but the product was never released. Now, a prototype has landed in the hands of a Chinese reviewer who conducted detailed benchmarks. The results showed that the performance improvement over the lower-tier Core Ultra 7 270K Plus was a mere 2%, clearly demonstrating why Intel ultimately decided against launching the product.
A Flagship with Minimal Performance Gains
The Core Ultra 9 290K Plus was planned to feature the same 24-core architecture (8P+8E) as the existing 285K while incorporating minor clock adjustments, support for DDR5-7200, and new Intel binary optimization tools. However, the prototype’s test results fell far short of expectations.
In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU-Z multi-core test showed a maximum performance increase of 2.84%, while the Cinebench R24 single-core test revealed a negligible improvement of just 0.69%. On average across all synthetic workloads, the difference was a mere 1.5%. Even in gaming performance at 1080p resolution, the uplift was only around 2%.
Tough Competition
In more demanding tasks such as compression, real-time rendering, and compilation, the competing AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D outperformed the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus in most tests. While the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus did manage to achieve a 9.3% lead in ANSYS Fluent simulations, the Ryzen 9 9950X3D maintained an overall advantage of approximately 8.3%.
Performance Comparison: Core Ultra 7 270K Plus vs. Core Ultra 9 290K Plus
These results indicate that Intel’s decision not to launch the flagship model was justified. Releasing a product with nearly identical performance as an upgraded version could have caused confusion among consumers. By positioning the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus as the de facto top model in its Arrow Lake Refresh lineup, Intel appears to have made a calculated and reasonable product decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Why was the Core Ultra 9 290K Plus not released?
- Benchmark results for the prototype showed only a 2% performance improvement over the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. Intel deemed this insufficient to justify its launch as a flagship model, opting instead to streamline its product lineup and avoid consumer confusion.
- Is the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus a worthwhile CPU to buy?
- Based on benchmark results, it offers performance nearly equivalent to the canceled flagship model, effectively making it the "real" flagship. However, it still lags behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D in overall performance, so users should compare options based on their specific needs and budget.
- Is there any chance the prototype will be released for sale?
- Since Intel has officially decided to cancel the launch, there are currently no plans for it to be commercially available. The tested unit was an engineering sample, which means it was developed solely for testing purposes and is not intended for the market.
Comments